<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JD18-JH Update: Kanthal A-1 Elements</title>
	<link>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/</link>
	<description>Decorative Crystalline Glazed Porcelain Artwork: Vases, Bottles, Finial Jars, &#38; Ornaments</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: greg beckman</title>
		<link>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>greg beckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-776</guid>
		<description>hey jesse,

do you know, is the only positive thing about the APM's over the A-1's their lifespan? Or can the APM's fire faster? or to higher temps? (i know thicker kiln brick helps with higher cone fire.) i just started doing crystalline firings several months ago. i have a skutt kiln bought all standard and i would like to try some ^11 and ^12 crystalline glazes but i am pretty new to the scene and have been afraid to try anything over ^10 since thats the max for the kiln (so it says). i know upgrading the brick to 3" helps, but i also heard APM elements helps attain higher cones and was considering getting them for this reason. is this true? i have had great crystal success since day 1 so the elements i have now are great, but i wanted to push the cone rating a bit and wasnt sure if my elements would be ok with that.

&lt;strong&gt;The main concern I have with APM elements is that they are expensive and just as vulnerable to being destroyed if (for instance) a speck of glaze lands on the element when loading, or a piece falls during the firing, etc.  I know folks with 140+ firings to the ^10-12 range on the thicker gauge A-1's of the JH series kilns, so I don't see the benefit of APM's myself.  ~Jesse.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey jesse,</p>
<p>do you know, is the only positive thing about the APM&#8217;s over the A-1&#8217;s their lifespan? Or can the APM&#8217;s fire faster? or to higher temps? (i know thicker kiln brick helps with higher cone fire.) i just started doing crystalline firings several months ago. i have a skutt kiln bought all standard and i would like to try some ^11 and ^12 crystalline glazes but i am pretty new to the scene and have been afraid to try anything over ^10 since thats the max for the kiln (so it says). i know upgrading the brick to 3&#8243; helps, but i also heard APM elements helps attain higher cones and was considering getting them for this reason. is this true? i have had great crystal success since day 1 so the elements i have now are great, but i wanted to push the cone rating a bit and wasnt sure if my elements would be ok with that.</p>
<p><strong>The main concern I have with APM elements is that they are expensive and just as vulnerable to being destroyed if (for instance) a speck of glaze lands on the element when loading, or a piece falls during the firing, etc.  I know folks with 140+ firings to the ^10-12 range on the thicker gauge A-1&#8217;s of the JH series kilns, so I don&#8217;t see the benefit of APM&#8217;s myself.  ~Jesse.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-695</guid>
		<description>Hello Jesse,
Thank you for your very useful information.   It's a big help.
I have been fireing cone ten oxidation in a gas kiln for years.  I want to start fireing electric because I am moveing to a house with very good solar panels.
I am looking a the  L &#38; L e quad and the JH series.   Can you tell me which one you would recommend? Is the JH series a better choice even though it is $5,000 compared to $3,000 or the e quad?
I drop cone ten and do not tip cone eleven.   I do not fire crystals so I do not hold at cone ten.
Thank you.   David

&lt;strong&gt;Hm.  I guess I would suggest speaking with the folks at L&#038;L and explain what you're wanting the kiln to do.  When I was collaborating on the design for the JH series, I was after a kiln with a longer lifespan and less maintenance where high temperatures (^10-12), even firing, and rapid cooling are necessary.    Keep in mind that many components on a ^10 kiln aren't actually rated for that temperature range.  ~Jesse.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jesse,<br />
Thank you for your very useful information.   It&#8217;s a big help.<br />
I have been fireing cone ten oxidation in a gas kiln for years.  I want to start fireing electric because I am moveing to a house with very good solar panels.<br />
I am looking a the  L &amp; L e quad and the JH series.   Can you tell me which one you would recommend? Is the JH series a better choice even though it is $5,000 compared to $3,000 or the e quad?<br />
I drop cone ten and do not tip cone eleven.   I do not fire crystals so I do not hold at cone ten.<br />
Thank you.   David</p>
<p><strong>Hm.  I guess I would suggest speaking with the folks at L&#038;L and explain what you&#8217;re wanting the kiln to do.  When I was collaborating on the design for the JH series, I was after a kiln with a longer lifespan and less maintenance where high temperatures (^10-12), even firing, and rapid cooling are necessary.    Keep in mind that many components on a ^10 kiln aren&#8217;t actually rated for that temperature range.  ~Jesse.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbrecht Troost</title>
		<link>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbrecht Troost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Hello Jesse.
I bought one of these kilns about a year ago and it is a really good kiln for growing crystals.
I was also debating in the beginning to get APM elements but  with a new kiln that came with the Kanthal elements upgrading to APM was still a additional $500 or so.  I decided to use the Kanthals first and then decide wether I wanted to spend the extra money for the APM.  I am now on my 135th firing,a few of those are bisque (maybe 10) but the most are ^10 firing and they are still working good. They are starting to lean into each other a little and it is taking a few more minutes to reach temperature; but I just lower the top temperature a few degrees and am still getting great results.  
So I am not sure that the APM's are the way to go seeing the price difference.  

Ok then see you at Phil's in october.

LTR
Robert.

&lt;strong&gt;Hey Robert, 
135 firings  -that's great to hear!
I'm not convinced that APM's are really necessary in regard to a JH series kiln.  My view of APM's in general is that if a piece of glaze, clay, silica, etc lands on your elements, or if a glazed pot falls on them during a firing, that metal isn't going to stand up to it any more than Kanthal A-1.  If an accident does occur, then the APM's are going to cost A LOT more to replace.  
With nearly 90 firings on my current set of elements in the cone 10-12 range (and all the reports I've gotten from others using this gauge of Kanthal), I can't see myself ever going with APM's.

Looking forward to Phil's as well!
~jesse.

&lt;/strong&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jesse.<br />
I bought one of these kilns about a year ago and it is a really good kiln for growing crystals.<br />
I was also debating in the beginning to get APM elements but  with a new kiln that came with the Kanthal elements upgrading to APM was still a additional $500 or so.  I decided to use the Kanthals first and then decide wether I wanted to spend the extra money for the APM.  I am now on my 135th firing,a few of those are bisque (maybe 10) but the most are ^10 firing and they are still working good. They are starting to lean into each other a little and it is taking a few more minutes to reach temperature; but I just lower the top temperature a few degrees and am still getting great results.<br />
So I am not sure that the APM&#8217;s are the way to go seeing the price difference.  </p>
<p>Ok then see you at Phil&#8217;s in october.</p>
<p>LTR<br />
Robert.</p>
<p><strong>Hey Robert,<br />
135 firings  -that&#8217;s great to hear!<br />
I&#8217;m not convinced that APM&#8217;s are really necessary in regard to a JH series kiln.  My view of APM&#8217;s in general is that if a piece of glaze, clay, silica, etc lands on your elements, or if a glazed pot falls on them during a firing, that metal isn&#8217;t going to stand up to it any more than Kanthal A-1.  If an accident does occur, then the APM&#8217;s are going to cost A LOT more to replace.<br />
With nearly 90 firings on my current set of elements in the cone 10-12 range (and all the reports I&#8217;ve gotten from others using this gauge of Kanthal), I can&#8217;t see myself ever going with APM&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Looking forward to Phil&#8217;s as well!<br />
~jesse.</p>
<p></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ouzts</title>
		<link>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ouzts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>L&#38;L just made another sale when I saw this 80+ posting.  Astounding results and special thanks for generating this detailed professional assessment. I applaude your diligence.  

Paul O.

&lt;strong&gt;NICE  -thanks much, Paul!!! Enjoy the new kiln, and let me know how things go...

~jesse.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L&amp;L just made another sale when I saw this 80+ posting.  Astounding results and special thanks for generating this detailed professional assessment. I applaude your diligence.  </p>
<p>Paul O.</p>
<p><strong>NICE  -thanks much, Paul!!! Enjoy the new kiln, and let me know how things go&#8230;</p>
<p>~jesse.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tymen Brom</title>
		<link>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Tymen Brom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jessehull.com/2008/04/29/jd18-jh-update-20mm-kanthal-a-1-elements/#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Hi,
You have a great site.  I am interested in your review of the Kanthal A1 elements.  It is now about 10 months since you published this review and I am wondering if you views have changed.  How many firings did you get before there was significant degradation in the performance?

Thanks

Tymen

&lt;strong&gt;Hey Tymen, 
In regards to how many firings I get... Well, I haven't found out yet  :)  
At 80+ firings in the ^10-12 range, they're still going like new!  
~jesse.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
You have a great site.  I am interested in your review of the Kanthal A1 elements.  It is now about 10 months since you published this review and I am wondering if you views have changed.  How many firings did you get before there was significant degradation in the performance?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Tymen</p>
<p><strong>Hey Tymen,<br />
In regards to how many firings I get&#8230; Well, I haven&#8217;t found out yet  <img src='http://jessehull.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
At 80+ firings in the ^10-12 range, they&#8217;re still going like new!<br />
~jesse.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

